Menu Shopping cart
Your basket is empty.
Support us
PISAVA
VELIKOST

CTRL+ ZA POVEČAVO
CTRL- ZA POMANJŠAVO

VELIKE/MALE
STIL
Art in Slovenia

Neoclassicism

Venus de Milo
(1927), plaster, 216 x 63 x 67 cm

NG P 923, National Gallery of Slovenia, Ljubljana
From the Renaissance onwards, collections of plaster casts of ancient sculpture were seen as one of the most effective study aids for painters and sculptors. Later, newly established museums and galleries around the world used presentations of these casts to bring the great achievements of ancient sculpture closer to the contemporary public. In this way, they contributed to the formation of taste and aesthetic criteria, enabling individuals to develop a true conception of the beautiful, something that was also among the stated aims at the founding of Slovenia’s National Gallery. 
In 1927 the board of the National Gallery, at the prompting of its director Izidor Cankar, acquired 63 casts from the Louvre. After the Second World War, the National Gallery loaned some of the sculptures to the Academy of Fine Arts and the School of Arts and Crafts for study purposes, while a number of casts were used to decorate the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts. In recent years, in an effort to preserve the collection, the works have gradually been returned to the National Gallery and restored (see also NG P 916, 901 and 913). 
Venus de Milo is the work of the Greek sculptor Alexandros of Antioch and dates from the period 130–100 BC. It was not rediscovered until 1820 on the Greek island of Milos, from which it takes its name. Already missing its arms at the time of its rediscovery, it was initially thought to be a depiction of the sea-goddess Amphitrite, who was venerated on the island. The statue’s sensuality and bare torso, and the fact that an apple carved from the same stone was found near the statue (the apple being an attribute of Venus), later gave weight to the theory that it is a depiction of Aphrodite or Venus. Ever since its rediscovery, the Venus de Milo has been considered a prototype of beauty and has become one of the most recognised and most influential works of art in the world.


Plaster cast; Greek work, Island of Milos; (copy 1927)

Neoclassicism
Franc Kavčič/Caucig was an important representative of European Neo-classicist painting. Even though he depicted stories from Greco-Roman antiquity, his ethical message is fully contemporary and mirrors the time of great social changes. 

In the 1780s, Kavčič was trained in Rome where he drew also at the French Academy at the time of the second sojourn of Jacques Louis David in the Eternal City, and when Angelika Kauffmann occupied the former residence of Anton Raphael Mengs. After more than twenty years of professorship at the Vienna art academy, Kavčič was appointed director of its painting and sculpture school. He also led the painting department of the Viennese porcelain factory, and towards the end of his life he became an honorary member of the Accademia di San Luca in Rome. Several of his compositions thus appeared on the products of the imperial porcelain works. 

His paintings are characteristic for their compositional monumentality and clarity, impeccable modelling by means of sharp drawing, thin polished paintlayers, underlined role of female protagonists in his scenes, and academic reserve. He relied for his motifs on the rich treasury of classical history and mythology as well as biblical stories. The Old-Testament Judgement of Solomon as a narrative of the ruler’s wisdom was thus a very suitable subject matter for the prestigious commission from Emperor Francis I. As to literary sources, Kavčič was inspired by the Idylls of Salomon Gessner. The painter’s landscapes are of the Arcadian type, they are ideal and thoughtfully composed in accord with classical rules and his travel memories. They contain architectural vestiges of the glorious past and are animated by means of tiny pastoral scenes. 

The painting output by Kavčič had some influence on his numerous Viennese students in the first half of the 19th century, while in the history of art he also left trace by taking part in the intense polemics with the members of the Brotherhood of St Luke, when he defended the then already conservative ideas.